According to Preston, editors managing a peer review process are asked to rate reviews on the basis of helpfulness and timeliness, with Publons then highlighting outstanding metrics. Everybody loves this different concept of review quality and agrees its really important. We do hope that, as we scale up this process, providing more feedback to reviewers will improve the overall review process, said Preston. But despite encouraging researchers to make peer reviews public, Preston hasnt yet seen an obvious shift from traditional to open peer review. He points to a rise in interest and experiments, adding: With increasing interest, i think the overall market will change over time but we havent seen this yet. One of the important things for us is to work with publishing partners and editors to educate them on the possibility of open peer review, he emphasises.
Chinese journal of Catalysis, elsevier
And reviewers are also telling us they will use their contribution as a reviewer on their CVs. Honing your skills as a journal reviewer can help you to evaluate and write better funding proposals. Recognition counts, elsevier is hardly alone in its acknowledgment that reviewer recognition is increasingly important. Launched in 2012, publons is a website and free service for researchers to share, discuss and receive credit for peer review. According to co-founder Andrew Preston, he and his business partner, daniel Johnston, set out to improve peer review market at a time when no obvious online way existed for a reviewer to receive recognition. It has always been hard to get recognition through review as most peer review was been either blind or unpublished, or both, explains Preston. Given this, publons has forged partnerships with Springer Nature, bmj, sage, wiley and more, and to date, more than 100,000 researchers have joined the site. As part of this, reviewers can choose whether or not to make review content open access following article publication, with Publons adhering to a journals review policy. But, as Preston says: we do support all peer review processes, yet want to encourage open review, as we believe this is really important for trust, understanding and bringing context to peer review. In its ongoing bid to promote quality review, publons has devoted much effort to developing methods to measure the quantity of a reviewers peer review. However, in recent months, the company has also focused on measuring the quality of peer review.
Whats more, elsevier surveys indicate open peer review actually increases the quality of review reports. According to terheggen, when authors taking part in the publishing peer review Pilot were asked if they noticed an increase in the quality of review reports, a massive 70 per cent replied that the reports were more in-depth and constructive. As the managing director puts it: This 70 per cent is a convincing number. To support such findings, the company is now rolling out open peer review metrics that, for example, measure how many reviews are conducted per article, how many reviews a reviewer has written, and also determine review report empire quality. Indeed, as Terheggen also points out, open peer review can bring much-needed recognition for the reviewer. Once a review report is made freely accessible and interlinked to the original articles, it is given a separate digital Object Identifier. This means reviewers that choose to publish these reports with their names can claim the report as a publication and include it on their orcid profile. These review reports now become citable items, highlights Terheggen.
Success prompted the publishing peer review pilot across four additional nashville journals, to further test the waters on open peer review and get feedback on the thorny question, would you reveal your name in a published review report? (see box biography out: Elseviers radical idea). According to terheggen, from the beginning reviewers were open to having their review report published, with nearly 50 per cent happy for the information analytics company to reveal his or her name. Whats more, editor and author interviews indicated that, of the reviewers that remained anonymous first time around, 36 per cent claimed to be happy to reveal their names in their next review. Our pilot has included journals from very different fields and were just not seeing pushback from anywhere, says Terheggen. And if I look beyond Elsevier, i see a relatively broad uptake from elife to nature communications; there is no indication yet that a field is not suitable. For Terheggen, transparent and open peer review is critical to the future of journals publishing. For starters, he believes the process conveys trust among publishers, authors and reviewers: If you are willing to share all information around peer review, this increases trust of already trustworthy information, he says. And quality journals are happy to open up their peer review reports with consent from reviewers and authors, or course.
When Nature launched a trial of open peer review in June 2006, its editors and publishers felt peer review was never perfect and the time was right to explore a more participative approach. But minimal uptake meant that come the end of the trial, nature director, timo hannay, had decided scientists werent ready for open peer review yet. A little over a decade later, a very different picture is emerging. The likes of biomed Central, peerJ and F1000 Research welcome this flavour of peer review while myriad journals, including Nature communications, are trialling processes. And, importantly for scholarly publishing, industry heavyweight Elsevier has just revealed plans to add optional open peer review to its fleet of 1,800 journals by 2020. Weve had positive feedback from our pilot titles, so we now want to roll out open peer review across all Elsevier-owned journals, highlights Philippe terheggen, managing director of the companys journals group. We are currently preparing the infrastructure for this, and will take a community-led approach with a three-year phased approach. It is best to have a multi-year phase in, and not a big bang, so this will take until 2019, and that is ok we really want to take the market with. It all started in January 2012, when the Elsevier journal Agricultural and Forest Metrology began publishing editor-selected peer review reports next to its published articles on ScienceDirect.
Steroids - journal, elsevier
For more information about the journal Finder project, visit Elsevier's Elsevier's Authors Home or contact Project coordinator Elizabeth Ash ( )./note Elsevier Connect Contributors As Project coordinator for stm journals at Elsevier, Elizabeth Ash heads the journal Finder project. She is based in Amsterdam. Lyndsay scholefield is Senior Marketing Communications Manager at Elsevier, based in Oxford. Optics laser Technology aims to provide a vehicle for the publication of a broad range of high quality research and review papers in those fields of scientific and engineering research appertaining to the development and application of the technology of optics and lasers. Papers describing original work in these areas are submitted to rigorous refereeing prior to acceptance for publication.
The scope of, optics laser Technology encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: development in all types of lasers developments in optoelectronic devices and photonics developments in new photonics and optical concepts developments in conventional optics, optical instruments and components techniques of optical. Lidar and other non-contact optical measurement techniques, including optical methods in heat and fluid flow applications of lasers to materials processing, optical ndt display (including holography) and optical communication research and development in the field pollution of laser safety including studies of hazards resulting from the. The journal publishes and, from time to time commissions, review articles pertaining to important areas of optical and laser technology. Short communications and technical notes are also published. Short papers for rapid communication of important innovations or observations will receive fast-track treatment. Optics laser Technology aims to provide the widest possible coverage of world research and development in its chosen field.
The tool makes recommendations from the 2,500 journals published by Elsevier. After being one of the first to test the tool,. Radiation measurements, wrote: "The results matched precisely with my own judgement.". How the idea came about, at Elsevier, we receive feedback from over 60,000 authors each year. By listening to our authors, we are able to make continual improvements to our services, and design products from the vantage point of the people who will use 2012, we launched the.
Author Mobile Apps competition, which asked early-career researchers to submit their ideas for journal-based mobile applications. The competition received an overwhelming response, with 3,775 ideas submitted. By a happy coincidence, the winning idea a "Scope-finder" that would find the best fitting journal for a paper had already been identified as a priority for Elsevier and was incorporated into the development of the. Hearing of this need directly from the customer confirmed that we were on the right track and should build such a tool as soon as possible. The competition winner,. Peter "TJ" Willemsen a research scientists in molecular biology for the central Veterinary Institute of Wageningen University research Centre in the netherlands, has tested and endorsed the new tool, saying: Elsevier's journal Finder tool is helpful for authors in doubt of which journal fits their. This can occur when it involves an intermediate field of research subjects or when authors are in the early stages of their research career, trying to locate the right journal to publish their manuscript. Sandra yee, dean of the University library system, wayne State University in Michigan, said the journal Finder tool will help faculty members and librarians by providing "substantive data and more specific information." note color f1f9fc" position"alignnone" width800 margin10 Tell us what you think your feedback. Please take a few moments to try it out on the authors' home section of m; then email your thoughts to with the following subject line: Elsevier journal Finder (beta) - user feedback.
Gov - (J1/Manpower personnel)
SciVal words Experts, an expertise profiling system and research networking tool, and. SciVal Funding, which helps researchers find funding sources and helps funding agencies find researchers to review grant applications. Source: SciVal /note, the journal Finder tool uses Scopus and the. Elsevier Fingerprinting Engine to locate Elsevier journals that most closely match an author's list of keywords and/or abstracts. An Elsevier journal will be recommended if it has published articles which have a high similarity with the new article. A list of potential journals will be created for authors and the tool will allow filtering based on author's preferred criteria (such as Impact Factor, open-access options, review time, acceptance rate, publication eksempel times and frequency). The final selected journal links directly to the journal's homepage and the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) page.
Then you are required to select the subject areas relevant to their paper. You can filter the results to those journals that have open-access options. The tool then generates a list of Elsevier journals that match the topic of their abstract. They can then order the results based on their priorities, such as highest Impact Factor or federalist shortest editorial time. What is the Elsevier Fingerprinting Engine? The, elsevier Fingerprinting Engine is a software system that mines the text of scientific documents publication abstracts, funding announcements and awards, project summaries, patents, proposals/applications, and other sources to create an index of weighted terms which defines the text, known as a fingerprint visualization. The transferability of fingerprinting to other tools in an example of how Elsevier is benefiting from the expertise. Collexis, a semantic technology software developer Elsevier acquired in 2010. Elsevier is using the "fingerprinting" technology for various products for Academic and government Institutional Markets, including.
to Elsevier's Authors' home are trying to decide which journal they should submit their paper. Meanwhile, editors must sift through many out-of-scope papers when authors choose journals that are a poor match. Our role is to support authors by getting them published in the best possible journal as fast as possible. That's where the new, journal Finder tool comes. . A beta version is online. How journal Finder works, you can find journal Finder on Authors Home: m/authors. If you click on the "Start matching" button, you will be presented with the search screen below, where you can enter your paper title, abstract and keywords.
Genes) lab in relation to our database linking program. These items should also receive your attention during the peer review process. Journal Finder, in beta, was developed by Elsevier in response to feedback from authors. By elizabeth Ash and Lyndsay scholefield Posted on Getting a research paper published can be a challenge. It's even more challenging when considering the risk of rejection that comes from submitting a paper to a journal that's not the right fit. Note color f1f9fc" position"right" width400 margin10 align"alignright". The journal Finder tool, helps inexperienced authors to select the correct journals for their papers.
Build failed in Jenkins: sling-contrib-1
If you accept, you must treat the materials you receive as confidential documents. This means you cant share them with anyone without prior authorization from the editor. Since peer review is confidential, you also must not share information about the review with anyone without permission from the editors and authors. First read the article and then take a break from it, giving you time to think. Consider the article from your own perspective. When you sit down to write the review, make sure you know what the journal is looking for, and have a copy of any specific reviewing criteria you need to consider. Authors may add research resume data, including data visualizations, to their submission to enable readers to interact and engage more closely with their research after publication. Please be aware that links to data might be present in the submission files. Manuscripts may also contain database identifiers or accession numbers (e.g.